Dear all,
The proponents have responded to our comments on PAPER-2015-053. They can be found at https://cds.cern.ch/record/2116308. Please take a look and see whether your comments were adequately adressed.
Personally, I think most of their response is good, but I am not satisfied with their answers to our questions on fixing most of their fit shapes and determining a systematic uncertainty for their fit model. They do not answer the question on fixing their shapes, and on the topic of determining the systematic uncertainties they only discuss why they choose now to vary their shapes to estimate fit model uncertainties, and ignore the topic of possible toy studies. What do you think we should do about this?
Cheers,
Mick
Op 17/12/15 om 13:42 schreef CERN Document Server Submission Engine:
Dear LHCb Colleague, The comment (LHCB-PAPER-2015-053-001-COMMENT-004) that you made on LHCB-PAPER-2015-053-001 (entitled: 'Measurement of the inclusive $B_{s}^{0} \rightarrow D_{s}^{(\ast)+}D_{s}^{(\ast)-}$ branching fraction') has itself been commented on by Adrian Andrew Pritchard [CERN - PH/ULB] (adrian.pritchard@cern.ch).
This new comment (LHCB-PAPER-2015-053-001-COMMENT-012) may be seen at http://cds.cern.ch/record/2116308
Best regards, The CERN Document Server Server support Team