Hi Marcel,
I have two comments:
1) If I multiply the p-values for 2.9 and 3.0 sigma, I get more something like 4.5 sigma? ( (2.7x10^-3)**2 = 7.3x10^-6 ) The paper quotes 3.7 sigma; what did I do wrong? (I also mailed Nicola, but didn't get a reply yet.)
2) I would suggest to make the figures more self-explanatory. (The fact that the details are in the caption does not help much for talks.) In particular, "SM" in Fig.5 refers to Straub, whereas "SM" in Fig.6 refers to Matias. There is so much debate on the various SM predictions, that the legend "SM" is confusing, I find. There is plenty of white space to spell out the legend? E.g.: "SM (Bharucha, Straub, Zwicky)" "SM (Descotes-Genon et al.)"
Cheers, Niels
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Marcel Merk wrote:
Dear bfys friends, Nikhef is not explicitly asked to give review comments on the paper below (B-->K*mumu), but given the impact of the result of the 2011 data I would invite you to have a look and give your comments to the paper. I am willing to collect the comments of our group. Please send them to me before the weekend.
cheers,
- Marcel
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rolf Oldeman rudolf.oldeman@cern.ch Date: 10 March 2015 at 23:14 Subject: Conference report circulation: CONF-2015-002, Angular analysis of the $B_d^0\to K^{*0}\mu^+\mu^-$ decay Dear colleagues, To: "lhcb-general (LHCb General mailing list)" lhcb-general@cern.ch
A conference report is available for your comments:
Title: Angular analysis of the $B_d^0\to K^{*0}\mu^+\mu^-$ decay Contact authors: Christoph Langenbruch, Konstantinos Petridis, Nicola Serra Reviewers: Greig Cowan (chair), Stephane T'Jampens, Patrick Koppenburg, Michael Schmelling (EB) Analysis note: ANA-2013-097, INT-2013-058 Deadline: 16-Mar-2015 e-group: lhcb-conf-2015-002-reviewers Link: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2000337 Twiki: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/LHCbPhysics/BdToKstarMuMu
Institutes requested to submit comments on the report: Bucharest-Magurele, Romania Milano-Bicocca, Italy Padova, Italy Maryland, USA
After the deadline, the reviewers are charged with approving the report for public release, once they are satisfied that any comments have been taken into account. You can find all reports open for comments via the EB web-page, by clicking on Current Drafts.
http://lhcb.web.cern.ch/lhcb/lhcb_page/collaboration/organization/editorial _board
Regards, Rolf Oldeman
--