Hi Tjeerd,

Thanks. A few follow-up.

Abstract:
Replace "is" by "of" in "The measured ratio is ...".
Above it "the production of X baryons in Y decays" is 
used to indicate f_X \times B(Y).
But "the production of X baryons in Y decays is studied"
can be understood as "f_X is studied by using Y decays".

I do not understand what you mean. What would like them to write?

Line 2: Replace "birth" by "beginning".

I quite like birth.

Line 3: Add "valence" in "three valence quarks".

Figure 1:
Add the leading order diagram of Lambda_b->J/Psi p K^- decays
to the figure (or modify the text in line 17).
Such a figure is not available in Refs [4] and [5].

It's Fig.1 of [4].

Thanks for the others. There are indeed a few places that need clarifications.

Cheers,

Patrick

On 11/23/2016 03:27 PM, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:

Dear Patrick,

I attach a few remarks on the second paper.

Tjeerd 

On Dinsdag 15 November 2016 11:48 CET, Patrick Koppenburg <patrick.koppenburg@cern.ch> wrote:

Hi all,

It's snowing papers. There are twelve (!) papers in first circulation. 
Looks like everybody wants to go to CKM. We are lucky that only two are 
assigned to us

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2232051/ Observation of triply charmed 
B+cdecays B+c→J/ψD(∗)K(∗)

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2232721/ Observation of the Ξ−b→J/ψΛK−decay

Neither will make particle physics history (though a Run 2 update of the 
second could...) The deadline for comments are on 25 November. Anyone 
volunteering to collect comments?

Thanks

Patrick

-- 
========================================================================
  Patrick Koppenburg                                   Nikhef, Amsterdam
  http://www.koppenburg.org/address.html

-- 
========================================================================
 Patrick Koppenburg                                   Nikhef, Amsterdam
 http://www.koppenburg.org/address.html