Hi Sean,
These are mine.
l139: Reference 24 is a measurement of the KPi detection asymmetry, not the kaon. Could you mention that you remove the pion contribution using an independent calibration measurement? l143: Reference 24 does not any number for the pion detection asymmetry. How do you get this? l157: This seems worrying. Is there any chance the phase-space coverage is improved in Run 2? Fig.2: The variables in the axis titles have to be italic, and c as well. This holds for more figures. l163: Figure 3 does not show the rapidity distribution of the Lambda b, which is required to draw this conclusion. l163: In Fig. 3 the pseudorapidity distribution does look a bit shifted, compatible with the slightly lower pT distribution. I am surprised this does not lead to any difference in the production asymmetry. Why does this not lead to a difference in trigger asymmetry? Table 1: There is both a “Particle identification” systematic uncertainty, and a “PID asymmetry”. Shouldn’t this be the same thing? Table 1: Why is there an entry for the "kaon or pion detection asymmetry”, but no mention in the paper where this number comes from?
On 21 May 2018, at 15:31, Sean Benson sean.benson@nikhef.nl wrote:
Hi all,
A reminder to read the paper and provide comments. They would be appreciated by Thursday.
Best, Sean
Op 21 mei 2018, om 15:29 heeft Sean Benson sean.benson@cern.ch het volgende geschreven:
Hi all,
A reminder to read the paper and provide comments. They would be appreciated by Thursday.
Best, Sean
Op 16 mei 2018, om 19:08 heeft Patrick Koppenburg patrick.koppenburg@cern.ch het volgende geschreven:
Dear all,
We have a new paper assigned to us. Sean kindly agreed to collect our comments. Please note the circulation deadline is 26/5.
Cheers,
Patrick
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: First circulation of publication draft for PAPER-2018-025, Search for $C!P$ violation in $\Lambda^0_b o pK^-$ and $\Lambda^0_b o p\pi^-$ decays Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 18:28:57 +0200 From: Patrick Koppenburg patrick.koppenburg@cern.ch To: LHCb General mailing list lhcb-general@cern.ch CC: LHCb-PAPER-2018-025-reviewers@cern.ch
Dear Colleagues,
A draft paper is available for your comments. Note that due to conference deadlines this draft is on a slightly accelerated schedule.
Team leaders, verify the author list and check for reading obligations. The following institutes are requested to make institutional comments via the CDS link given below:
NIKHEF, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Edinburgh, United Kingdom Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy Yandex School of Data Analysis, Moscow, Russia CBPF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Title : Search for $C!P$ violation in $\Lambda^0_b o pK^-$ and $\Lambda^0_b o p\pi^-$ decays Journal : PLB Contact authors : Fabio Ferrari, Stefano Perazzini Reviewers : Irina Nasteva (chair), Shanzhen Chen EB reviewer : Alberto Correa dos Reis EB readers : Franco Bedeschi, Mike Williams Analysis note : ANA-2018-002 Deadline : 26-May-2018 e-group : lhcb-paper-2018-025-reviewers CDS link : https://cds.cern.ch/record/2318506
Authors : LHCb Twiki : https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCbPhysics/Lb2phCPV
It is the responsibility of the contact authors to provide replies to all comments made. Subsequent modifications to the draft will be made in consultation with the reviewers and during the EB reading. Following this, there will be a final meeting of the editorial board, with contact authors and reviewers present, when final decisions will be made. As the last step, the collaboration will be given a final opportunity to comment during a 'silent approval' period.
You can find all paper and conference report drafts open for comments via the EB web-page, by clicking on Current Drafts:
http://lhcb.web.cern.ch/lhcb/lhcb_page/collaboration/organization/editorial_...
Best regards, Patrick
--
Patrick Koppenburg Nikhef, Amsterdam
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics