Re: [Bfys-physics] K*mumu review

There was an addition :

Dear All,

To come back to the phi definition, I have just realised that part of the expression for sin phi in the paper draft was missing. It should have said:

\sin \phi = \left( (\hat{p}_{\mup} \times \hat{p}_{\mun}) \times (\hat{p}_{\Kp}\times \hat{p}_{\pim}) \right) \cdot \hat{p}_{\Kstarz}

I am not sure how we missed this before the draft was circulated.

Tom

https://cds.cern.ch/record/1540190?ln=en

On 04/08/2013 05:41 PM, Patrick Koppenburg wrote:

Hi all,

The K*mumu people were very fast in replying to our review. See

https://cds.cern.ch/record/1537911

I have not digested all of that yet. One cookie goes to Jeroen for having spotted a mistake in a formula.

Cheers,

Patrick