Dear Laurent,

General:

I find our relative branching fractions with respect 
to Lambda_b to Lambda+_c ppbar pi-
strange quantities to publish.
The PDG gives B(Sigma0_c to Lambda_c+ pi-) is 100%.
And less precise but similar also for B(Sigma*0_c to Lambda_c+ pi-).
Also the numerical results are confusing. See below.

Line 4:
After "channel" may be a better location for the footnote reference number.

Table 1:
I am surprised that Hadron interactions contribute so much.
Has that not been improved with the help of other decay channels
including (anti)protons?

Line 200-204:
This region should be reformulated as it does not make sense to me.
What is "rom"?
"is mainly contributed"?
"pi+ form the"?
"outside-region particles"?

Figure2:
In the insert the region of the two resonances is shown.
The figure should then represent the full range of Lambda+_c pi-.
Now I do not understand the numerical results of the relative branching 
fractions with respect to Lambda_b to Lambda+_c ppbar pi-:
0.093 and 0.117.
I would expect 0.45 and 0.55 as the remaining contribution is
considered background and therefore not off resonance signal.

Line 282:
Replace "analagous" by "analogue".

I have also a comment for Figure 4.
Does it go with the publication?

Best regards,
 Tjeerd