17 Apr 2015
Dear Jimmy,
Sorry for my late response.
Let me come back on a few points below.

Tjeerd

Line 7:
Explain the index p.
--> What do you mean here? There is no significance to the p as far as I know.
    == In Ref.[1] "The large value of the mixing angle phi_P in the 
       pseudoscalar sector, with respect to other ones (e.g. the vector 
       mesons ... with a mixing angle phi_V ..." 
       explains that P stands for pseudoscalar sector.
   
Line 31-32:
This is obvious.
The line in the figure seems more to the point than lines 27-32.
--> It is obvious but worth pointing out.
    == "The additional Feynman diagrams may enhance or reduce the
       branching fraction to eta' mesons through interference." 

Figure 2:
Label with L and D in the figures.
In all captions remove "in the 2011 and 2012 data".
--> Done (have kept the 2011 and 2012 data for clarity)
    == It is only in the systematic uncertainties that a distinction
       between 2011 and 2012 data is made. 
       The rest of the paper and all figures are about the 3 fm-1 
       dataset of 2011+2012.
       I do not see added clarity by its repetition. 

Table 1:
Replace a),b),c) by the corresponding decay and
remove them in the caption.
--> The table is to wide if I do that.
    == You can split Lambda0b->Lambda eta' and eta'->Pi+pi-gamma.
       This is also very clear, as it describes the two-step process.
      
Line 205-206: Isn't this obvious?
--> Yes but is needed to include the reference
    == I propose the add the following sentence to the previous
       paragraph after ".. 8%":
       "The systematic uncertainties of the branching fractions
       of K0, Lambda, eta, and eta' are taken from the Particle 
       Data Group [42]."
       A paragraph cannot be a single sentence.