On 06/02/15 16:12, Pieter David wrote:
Dear all,

I have combined the comments I got from Wouter, Jeroen, Patrick and Gerco (and 
added my own). Full list attached.
I removed one question from Gerco on the frame of reference for \Delta\phi: 
it's a transverse quantity, so it does not depend on the boost (unless you 
meant to ask for the effect of the beam crossing angle) - I can add it again if 
you insist.
There is also one from Patrick that I do not understand:

L286: "refine the sample of candidates for analysis" is jargon. "to reduce 

the same size used in the analysis"
well, I just don't like the way it's said. What they do is remove some obvious backgrounds. I am not sue how to phrase it, but I don't like "for analysis". We could also leave it to the EB.

Cheers,

Patrick

Please let me know by Monday lunchtime if there are more comments to be 
included, or if I missed anything.

Thanks,


Pieter



_______________________________________________
Bfys-physics mailing list
Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl
https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics



-- 
========================================================================
 Patrick Koppenburg                           LHCb Physics Coordinator
 Nikhef, Amsterdam & CERN
 http://www.koppenburg.org/address.html