Hi Rob,
Let me just clarify: you question the claim of 0.5%, is that correct?
just to make sure I understand which point you comment on.
cheers,
- Marcel


On 2 July 2013 10:06, Rob Lambert <Rob.Lambert@cern.ch> wrote:
Erm, just some statistical queries.. what about chebychev's inequality:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev's_inequality

"No more than 1/k^{2} of the distribution's values can be more than k standard deviations away from the mean" 

In this case it is 1/(3.7*3.7) which is 7%, and 24*7% is 1.75, so no more than 1.75 of the observables should be this far away. One deviation this large is perfectly expected from Chebychev's inequality.

Thanks,
 
Rob
 
------------------------------------------
Robert Lambert
FOM-VU-NIKHEF-Bfys LHCb
Email: rob.lambert@cern.ch
------------------------------------------
Nikhef N251
Tel: +31 20 592 2131  
Fax: 
+31 20 592 5155 
------------------------------------------
CERN, 13-1-018 
------------------------------------------

From: bfys-physics-bounces@nikhef.nl [bfys-physics-bounces@nikhef.nl] on behalf of Marcel Merk [marcel.merk@nikhef.nl]
Sent: 01 July 2013 18:01
To: bfys-physics@nikhef.nl
Subject: [Bfys-physics] B->K*mumu paper

Dear bfys-physics friend,
This is to let you know that I collect comments to the paper below.
To stimulate you to read it: we claim that the probability that the measurement is consistent with the Standard Model is only 0.5%. A local discrepancy of 3.7 sigma is observed.

  LHCb PAPER-2013-037:
      "Measurement of form factor independent observables
       in the decay $B^0\to K^{*0}\mu^+\mu^-$"
      Link            : https://cds.cern.ch/record/1557918
      Deadline        : 09-Jul-2013

best regards,
- Marcel

_______________________________________________
Bfys-physics mailing list
Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl
https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics