Hi Kristof,
Only a few comments on the paper from my side (a few repeating what we said this morning).
Cheers, Niels
Abstract * [It is surprising that the systematic error is two times smaller for the Bs0->D-Ds+ lifetime. How comes?]
L.102 [Kristof, I would keep this sentence with 97% and 33%, because the fact that you cut the background with an additional factor 3 can be interesting.]
L.149 [Add a sentence where you say why the B- normalization is preferred over the B0 normalization channel.]
Fig.1 [Add label inside plot: 'LHCb simulation']
Fig.3 [Add label 'LHCb']
Fig.3 [You assumed tau=1.5 ps when defining the bin centres; how large is the effect on your measurement if you would assume tau=1.25 ps?]
Fig.4 [Make font of legend non-bold]
[Just a warning: the PRL justification seems not asked for by PRL anylonger.]
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Bfys Meeting Friday 8 November in N328 and Vidyo
9:30 - 9:55 Staff meeting (only permanent staff) 10:00 - 10:50 "Introduction and discussion of LHCb-PAPER-2013-060: Measurement of the B0s(bar) to Ds+ Ds- and B0s(bar) to D- Ds+ effective lifetimes" by Kristof de Bruyn
The presentation can be found at http://agenda.nikhef.nl/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2622 and will be protected by lhcb, etc.
Vidyo link in Nikhef Bfys Meeting (at Institutes->Nikhef of Friday 21 June 2013) https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=255991 protected by PIN 1328.
Best regards, Tjeerd
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics
--