Dear all, To my embarrassment I overlooked the quick response to the comments. I will answer them today after feedback with you. Best regards, Tjeerd
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:46:32 +0200 From: CERN Document Server Submission Engine cds.support@cern.ch To: tjeerd@nikhef.nl Subject: LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001-COMMENT-005: review received
Dear LHCb Colleague, Your comment LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001-COMMENT-005 on draft LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001 (entitled: 'Branching fraction ratio and $CP$ asymmetry measurements of the $B^+ \to K_S^0 \pi^{+}$ and $B^{+} \to K_S^0 K^+$ decays.') has been responded to by Aurelien Martens of the reviewers.
The review will soon be available at the following URL:
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1560924 Kind regards, CERN Document Server.
Dear all,
I attached the proposed reaction. Patrick can you also have a look before tomorrow 12h.
Best regards, Tjeerd
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:
Dear all, To my embarrassment I overlooked the quick response to the comments. I will answer them today after feedback with you. Best regards, Tjeerd
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:46:32 +0200 From: CERN Document Server Submission Engine cds.support@cern.ch To: tjeerd@nikhef.nl Subject: LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001-COMMENT-005: review received
Dear LHCb Colleague, Your comment LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001-COMMENT-005 on draft LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001 (entitled: 'Branching fraction ratio and $CP$ asymmetry measurements of the $B^+ \to K_S^0 \pi^{+}$ and $B^{+} \to K_S^0 K^+$ decays.') has been responded to by Aurelien Martens of the reviewers.
The review will soon be available at the following URL:
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1560924 Kind regards, CERN Document Server. _______________________________________________ Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics
Hi Tjeerd,
--> A: The KS vertex - B vertex z projected distance cut must stay at the end because we must first define what we call a B. --> A: We inverted the order of the cuts for the B Vertex separation. But asking chi2VS on all PVS and asking VS>1mm is not the same thing. SO we believe it is better to keep both. --> C: Patrick, do you want to comment on this answer?
They still need to define "the PV".
Line 257: Remove "corresponding to data".
--> A: we think we need to keep. --> C: Patrick, do you want to comment on this answer?
It's data corresponding to 1 fb^-1, not 1 fb^-1 corresponding to data.
Lines 384-360: http://arxiv.org/abs/ in front of arXiv would convenient for clicking
--> A: sorry do not understand. ref 33 and 36 are clickable in our version. --> C: Patrick, do you want to comment on this answer?
My comment was about Ref 37 that misses http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0907.2256
Cheers,
Patrick
On 07/16/2013 03:18 PM, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:
Dear all,
I attached the proposed reaction. Patrick can you also have a look before tomorrow 12h.
Best regards, Tjeerd
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:
Dear all, To my embarrassment I overlooked the quick response to the comments. I will answer them today after feedback with you. Best regards, Tjeerd
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:46:32 +0200 From: CERN Document Server Submission Engine cds.support@cern.ch To: tjeerd@nikhef.nl Subject: LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001-COMMENT-005: review received
Dear LHCb Colleague, Your comment LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001-COMMENT-005 on draft LHCB-PAPER-2013-034-001 (entitled: 'Branching fraction ratio and $CP$ asymmetry measurements of the $B^+ \to K_S^0 \pi^{+}$ and $B^{+} \to K_S^0 K^+$ decays.') has been responded to by Aurelien Martens of the reviewers.
The review will soon be available at the following URL:
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1560924 Kind regards, CERN Document Server. _______________________________________________ Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics