Dear all,

We recieved replies on the gamma-combination CONF note. To summarize,

1) they will quote the "full combination" asymmetrically as we suggested, with extend lower uncertainty; 78.9 + 5.8 - 7.4

2) they will use the "robust combination" as main result for 3 reasons; the robust combination has better coverage, is more Gaussian and hence better useable in combinations by others, and has been cross checked by the Baysian method.

Cheers, Niels

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 15:40:39 +0200 From: CERN Document Server Submission Engine cds.support@cern.ch To: h71@nikhef.nl Subject: LHCB-CONF-2014-004-001-COMMENT-001: review received

Dear LHCb Colleague, Your comment LHCB-CONF-2014-004-001-COMMENT-001 on draft LHCB-CONF-2014-004-001 (entitled: 'Improved constraints on $\gamma$: CKM2014 update') has been responded to by Matthew William Kenzie of the reviewers.

The review will soon be available at the following URL:

http://cds.cern.ch/record/1753184 Kind regards, CERN Document Server.