Dear all,
We would like to share with you the first glimpse of the unblinded Bc -> Bs Pi, using Bs -> Ds Pi. Under study is the partially reconstructed contributions (Bs* pi), (Bs rho).
For 2011+2012, the significance at this point is 4.1 sigma (excluding systematics).
Thanks, also on behalf of Niels, Jacco
Congratulations! That's a nice peak!
So what would be the Bc->Bspi BF (roughtly)?
Cheers,
Patrick
On 05/15/2013 12:16 PM, Jacco de Vries wrote:
Dear all,
We would like to share with you the first glimpse of the unblinded Bc -> Bs Pi, using Bs -> Ds Pi. Under study is the partially reconstructed contributions (Bs* pi), (Bs rho).
For 2011+2012, the significance at this point is 4.1 sigma (excluding systematics).
Thanks, also on behalf of Niels, Jacco
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics
Thanks!
Using this fit, sigma(Bc)/fs x BR(Bc2BsPi) is [ 1.85 +- 0.46 (stat) + 0.37 - 0.35 (syst) ] x 10^-3
Which puts BR(Bc2BsPi) roughly to 19.9 +- 50% (rel.)
But we just discovered something is going wrong in the DTF, and it's not constraining the Bs mass. Working on this right now, and it should improve!
Cheers, Jacco
On 05/15/2013 02:07 PM, Patrick Koppenburg wrote:
Congratulations! That's a nice peak!
So what would be the Bc->Bspi BF (roughtly)?
Cheers,
Patrick
On 05/15/2013 12:16 PM, Jacco de Vries wrote:
Dear all,
We would like to share with you the first glimpse of the unblinded Bc -> Bs Pi, using Bs -> Ds Pi. Under study is the partially reconstructed contributions (Bs* pi), (Bs rho).
For 2011+2012, the significance at this point is 4.1 sigma (excluding systematics).
Thanks, also on behalf of Niels, Jacco
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics
-
Jacco de Vries -
Patrick Koppenburg