Op 22-04-10 09:05, Sander Klous schreef:
Hi, Comments please. Preferably before the meeting starts at 16:00 this afternoon.
Hi Sander,
Point 10 of the endorser policy looks like it contains a typo (Oscar found this already).
What I find missing is a method for revocation of an endorsement. Simply removing it from the endorsed list is not enough; there should be a signed statement saying 'I no longer endorse this combination, for this and this reason' and these should probably be distributed like CRLs.
Perhaps there should be automatic and/or implicit revocation, or at least expiry of a base system. When a security flaw is discovered, all the base systems that suffer it should no longer be used. And neither should any combination derived from them.
Just my 2ct.
Dennis
-- Sander
Begin forwarded message:
*Resent-From: *<hepix-virtualisation@cern.ch mailto:hepix-virtualisation@cern.ch> *From: *<david.kelsey@stfc.ac.ukmailto:david.kelsey@stfc.ac.uk> *Date: *April 22, 2010 12:32:26 AM GMT+02:00 *To: *<hepix-virtualisation@cern.chmailto:hepix-virtualisation@cern.ch> *Subject: **Updated draft of VM policy*
Dear all,
The updated draft (V1.2) of the Virtualisation Policy may be found at the JSPG wiki...
http://www.jspg.org/wiki/Policy_Trusted_Virtual_Machines
I also attach a PDF version just in case this is not reachable.
Lots of things to be discussed I am sure :=)
For discussion tomorrow.
Regards Dave
Dr David Kelsey Particle Physics Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, DIDCOT, OX11 0QX, UK
e-mail: david.kelsey@stfc.ac.uk Tel: [+44](0)1235 445746 (direct) Fax: [+44](0)1235 446733
-- Scanned by iCritical.
ct-grid mailing list ct-grid@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/ct-grid