Hi,
One more specific point I need input for before the discussion this afternoon:

We will introduce an endorser for the base and one for the VO software portions. We need to have a discussion about the requirements put on the role of the base image endorser. A simple "site member versus VO member" is not good enough to distinguish trust levels. So the question is: how do we "certify/qualify" a base image endorser?

Any ideas what is the list of requirements before we accept somebody as a base image endorser (i.e. endorsing the root portion of the installation)?

Thanks,
Sander

On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Sander Klous wrote:

Hi,
Comments please. Preferably before the meeting starts at 16:00 this afternoon.
-- Sander

Begin forwarded message:

Date: April 22, 2010 12:32:26 AM GMT+02:00
Subject: Updated draft of VM policy

Dear all,

The updated draft (V1.2) of the Virtualisation Policy may be found at
the JSPG wiki...

http://www.jspg.org/wiki/Policy_Trusted_Virtual_Machines

I also attach a PDF version just in case this is not reachable.

Lots of things to be discussed I am sure :=)

For discussion tomorrow.

Regards
Dave


------------------------------------------------
Dr David Kelsey
Particle Physics Department
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Chilton, DIDCOT, OX11 0QX, UK

e-mail: david.kelsey@stfc.ac.uk
Tel: [+44](0)1235 445746 (direct)
Fax: [+44](0)1235 446733
------------------------------------------------



--
Scanned by iCritical.

<VirtualisationPolicy-v1.2.pdf>

_______________________________________________
ct-grid mailing list
ct-grid@nikhef.nl
https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/ct-grid