Hello again Niels,

   I never heard back from you in response to the mail I sent (copied below) regarding
the acceptance of the three abstracts submitted by me on behalf of the ATLAS Liquid
Argon calorimeter group. 

   Our speakers committee was rather surprised to have all three accepted only as 
posters, as we have always managed to get oral presentations in the past. Could you
please confirm / clarify the situation for me? It will certainly affect our ability to identify
speakers if these abstract are indeed accepted only as posters.
 
   Regards,

       Peter

Begin forwarded message:

From: Peter Krieger <krieger@physics.utoronto.ca>
Date: March 19, 2014 11:57:04 AM EDT
To: <tipp2014@nikhef.nl>
Subject: Re: TIPP2014: Acceptance of contribution

Hello Niels,

 Could you please clarify something for me? I've just received three emails
to tell me that the three abstracts I submitted on behalf of the ATLAS Liquid
Argon group were accepted as posters.

  The request was, in all three cases, for an oral presentation. Was there
some error in my abstract submission, or did you simply decide to only
accept them as posters despite the request for oral presentations?

  Many thanks,

    Peter Krieger

On 2014-03-19, at 11:37 AM, <tipp2014@nikhef.nl> wrote:

Dear Peter Krieger,

We are pleased to inform you that your contribution:
Performance of the ATLAS liquid argon calorimeter after three years of LHC operation
has been accepted for an Poster presentation in the track
Sensors: 1a) Calorimetry.

We are looking forward to see you in Amsterdam,

Niels van Bakel,
On behalf of the track conveners and the local organizing committee