On 06/02/15 16:12, Pieter David wrote:
Dear all,
I have combined the comments I got from Wouter, Jeroen, Patrick and Gerco (and added my own). Full list attached. I removed one question from Gerco on the frame of reference for \Delta\phi: it's a transverse quantity, so it does not depend on the boost (unless you meant to ask for the effect of the beam crossing angle) - I can add it again if you insist. There is also one from Patrick that I do not understand:
L286: "refine the sample of candidates for analysis" is jargon. "to reduce
the same size used in the analysis"
well, I just don't like the way it's said. What they do is remove some obvious backgrounds. I am not sue how to phrase it, but I don't like "for analysis". We could also leave it to the EB.
Cheers,
Patrick
Please let me know by Monday lunchtime if there are more comments to be included, or if I missed anything.
Thanks,
Pieter
Bfys-physics mailing list Bfys-physics@nikhef.nl https://mailman.nikhef.nl/mailman/listinfo/bfys-physics