Hi Tjeerd,

Thanks. A few follow-up.

Abstract: Replace "is" by "of" in "The measured ratio is ...". Above it "the production of X baryons in Y decays" is used to indicate f_X \times B(Y). But "the production of X baryons in Y decays is studied" can be understood as "f_X is studied by using Y decays".

I do not understand what you mean. What would like them to write?

Line 2: Replace "birth" by "beginning".

I quite like birth.

Line 3: Add "valence" in "three valence quarks".

Figure 1: Add the leading order diagram of Lambda_b->J/Psi p K^- decays to the figure (or modify the text in line 17). Such a figure is not available in Refs [4] and [5].

It's Fig.1 of [4].

Thanks for the others. There are indeed a few places that need clarifications.

Cheers,

Patrick

On 11/23/2016 03:27 PM, Tjeerd Ketel wrote:

Dear Patrick,

I attach a few remarks on the second paper.

Tjeerd

On Dinsdag 15 November 2016 11:48 CET, Patrick Koppenburg patrick.koppenburg@cern.ch wrote:

...

Hi all,

It's snowing papers. There are twelve (!) papers in first circulation. Looks like everybody wants to go to CKM. We are lucky that only two are assigned to us

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2232051/ Observation of triply charmed B+cdecays B+c→J/ψD(∗)K(∗)

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2232721/ Observation of the Ξ−b→J/ψΛK−decay

Neither will make particle physics history (though a Run 2 update of the second could...) The deadline for comments are on 25 November. Anyone volunteering to collect comments?

Thanks

Patrick

--

Patrick Koppenburg Nikhef, Amsterdam http://www.koppenburg.org/address.html